Antarctica tops new index of the world’s most distinctive travel experiences

Bailey Robinson’s 88-destination study places nomadic stays in Mongolia and Arctic journeys in Greenland close behind, while Europe misses the top 10.

Silver Wind and Silver Endeavour expedition ships among ice in Antarctic waters

Silver Wind and Silver Endeavour in Antarctic waters, where a ship-based or fly-in polar expedition topped Bailey Robinson’s travel-experience index with 95 out of 100. — Credit: Nicolas Paulin / @niko.travel.mode

KEY TAKEAWAYS

  • A ship-based or fly-in Antarctic polar expedition leads the index with 95 out of 100.
  • Nomadic steppe travel in Mongolia and Arctic journeys in Greenland share second place with 94, followed by Bhutan with 92.
  • The top 10 averages 90.9, seven experiences score at least 90 and none is located in Europe.
  • The study compared 88 signature experiences using six weighted criteria, assessing the experience rather than the destination’s popularity or overall quality.

Remote journeys that demand active participation, rather than conventional visits to well-known sights, dominate a new ranking of distinctive travel experiences spanning five continents.

A ship-based or fly-in journey through Antarctica takes first place with 95 out of 100 in an index commissioned by Bailey Robinson. The research compares one signature experience in each of 88 destinations, using six weighted criteria to assess how closely an activity is tied to its setting, how deeply travellers participate and how difficult it would be to recreate elsewhere.

The result places horseback travel and stays with nomadic families in Mongolia alongside dogsledding and iceberg voyages in Greenland as the closest challengers. Both score 94, while a hike to Bhutan’s Tiger’s Nest Monastery combined with a Himalayan valley stay follows in fourth place on 92.

The world’s 10 highest-scoring unique travel experiences

Rank Unique travel experience Destination Score /100
1 Take a ship-based or fly-in polar expedition through ice-filled channels and remote Antarctic landscapes Antarctica 95
2 Ride across the steppe and stay with nomadic families in traditional gers Mongolia 94
2 Dogsled across the Arctic and sail among icebergs to remote coastal settlements Greenland 94
4 Hike to Tiger’s Nest Monastery and stay in a Himalayan valley lodge Bhutan 92
5 Climb Sossusvlei’s giant dunes and travel the remote Skeleton Coast Namibia 90
5 Trek the Inca Trail to Machu Picchu Peru 90
5 Trek to Everest Base Camp through the Himalayas Nepal 90
8 Explore Petra on foot and camp beneath the stars in Wadi Rum Jordan 89
9 Explore the Galápagos on a small-ship expedition Ecuador 88
10 Swim in Devil’s Pool beside Victoria Falls when water levels permit Zambia 87

The leading 10 experiences have an average score of 90.9, and seven reach at least 90. None is in Europe; instead, the list stretches across Antarctica, Asia, Africa and the Americas.

Remote access and active participation set the leaders apart

Antarctica’s winning entry treats the approach through ice-filled channels and remote polar landscapes as part of the trip, rather than reducing the continent to a point of arrival. Bailey Robinson’s own overview of Antarctic expedition cruising illustrates how both sea voyages and fly-and-sail arrangements can make the journey an integral element of exploring the continent.

The two second-place experiences reach a similar result through very different environments. In Mongolia, travellers cross the steppe on horseback and stay with nomadic families in traditional gers, bringing movement, landscape and a living cultural tradition into the same itinerary. Greenland’s entry combines dogsledding, sailing among icebergs and visits to remote coastal settlements, pairing physical activity with the isolation of an Arctic setting.

Bhutan’s fourth-ranked experience also makes the route inseparable from the attraction. The hike to Tiger’s Nest Monastery adds physical effort and Himalayan scenery to the visit, while a stay in a valley lodge extends the experience beyond the monastery itself.

Treks and landscape journeys fill the middle of the table

Three journeys share fifth place on 90. Namibia’s entry links the giant dunes of Sossusvlei with the distant Skeleton Coast. Peru is represented by the Inca Trail to Machu Picchu, where the approach on foot combines Andean landscapes with the route’s historical setting. Nepal’s Everest Base Camp trek likewise makes the passage through the Himalayas as important to the experience as the endpoint.

The final three positions broaden the mix without departing from the emphasis on participation. Walking through Petra and camping in Wadi Rum ranks eighth with 89, a small-ship expedition through Ecuador’s Galápagos Islands is ninth with 88, and swimming at Devil’s Pool beside Victoria Falls places tenth with 87. The Zambia experience is explicitly seasonal, as access depends on water levels.

When the experience becomes the destination

Across the table, the recurring feature is not simply remoteness or spectacle, but the combination of activity, environment and sense of place. Famous landmarks still appear, including Machu Picchu, Petra and Victoria Falls, yet each is paired with a trek, camp or physical encounter that changes the traveller’s role from observer to participant.

“The question travellers are asking is no longer simply ‘where should I go?’ It’s ‘what can I experience there that I can’t experience anywhere else?’” said Sarah Parker, Sales Director at Bailey Robinson. “As travellers increasingly prioritise meaningful, once-in-a-lifetime experiences over traditional sightseeing, the experience itself is becoming the destination.”

Parker’s comments describe the company’s view of changing traveller priorities. The index itself does not measure booking volumes, visitor satisfaction or the overall quality of a destination; it compares selected experiences against Bailey Robinson’s definition of uniqueness.

How the experiences were scored

Each destination was represented by one defining experience, rather than a collection of unrelated attractions. The six criteria and their maximum weights were:

  • Uniqueness and destination specificity — 30 points: how closely the experience is tied to its location and whether it could realistically be replicated elsewhere.
  • Immersion and participation — 20 points: the extent to which travellers take part instead of simply observing.
  • Expert recognition — 15 points: the experience’s recognition and prominence among established travel experts and authoritative travel sources.
  • Rarity and access limitation — 15 points: how remote, difficult or restricted the experience is to access.
  • Sense of place — 10 points: how strongly the activity reflects the destination’s landscape, culture or way of life.
  • Wow factor — 10 points: its overall adventure, spectacle and bucket-list appeal.

The study deliberately distributed results across a range of 60 to 95. Experiences considered popular, widely replicable, mostly observational or comparatively easy to access received lower scores, while remote, rare and participatory activities closely connected to their setting ranked higher. Where a destination offered several notable activities, the researchers selected a single signature experience rather than combining multiple attractions to raise its score.

The resulting table is therefore a comparison of the experiences under that scoring framework, not a ranking of destination popularity or overall quality. The underlying data was reported as accurate in August 2026.

Author